Southern Junior Roster 2024 · U16 Girls
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. DiamondBacks U16G | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 12 | 100% |
| 2. University U16G | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 83% |
| 3. Canterbury U16G | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 58% |
| 4. OHA U16G | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 | 25% |
| 5. NWG U16G | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 3 | 25% |
| 6. Derwent U16G | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.