2025 Southern Senior Competition · 2025 Second Grade Women
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. NWG | 16 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 64 | 6 | 58 | 42 | 88% |
2. Canterbury Red | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 41 | 14 | 27 | 37 | 77% |
3. Derwent | 16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 36 | 22 | 14 | 24 | 50% |
4. University Red | 16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 6 | 24 | 50% |
5. Canterbury Blue | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 34 | 26 | 8 | 23 | 48% |
6. DiamondBacks | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 31 | -5 | 23 | 48% |
7. OHA | 16 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 20 | 36 | -16 | 11 | 23% |
8. University Black | 16 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 96 | -92 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.